[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: michaelm@netsol.com, John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 14:57:01 -0500
So, the naming system contract:
1. Requires the host to guarantee global uniqueness
(which may fail but since when are bugs obsolete)
2. Is all names and a part of the name is NOT a locator
but a means to determine a part (membership - iow, if
it says where in the set, it is a locator).
3. Might enable resolution but does not guarantee it.
>Plus the semantics and policies surrounding URI schemes are less
>stringing which allows for different namespaces (not XML namespaces but
>spaces of identifiers) to be engineered for different reasons.
I don't get that "stringing" part. Stringent? An example may be clarifying.
Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@ingr.com
http://fly.hiwaay.net/~cbullard/lensongs.ram
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
|
