[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@qub.com>
- To: 'XML-Dev Mailing list' <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 15:51:13 -0800
----- Original Message -----
From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
> This is a bit of an exaggeration. XSL and XSLT were different activities,
> and XSLT *was* primarily directed at transformation. XSLT attempted to
> be a general-purpose semi-structured data transformation language, and
> is still the best thing we've got (if you value standards).
<q href =http://www.jclark.com/xml/xslt-talk.htm>
Not for Everything
XSLT is not a general-purpose XML transformation language
</q>
This is *very* true.
<q>
General-purpose XML transformation requires general-purpose programming language
</q>
This is not *that* true, I think.
Rgds.Paul.
|
