[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
- From: Jeff Rafter <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "Roger L. Costello" <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 15:57:12 -0800
> (1) There are many other schema languages besides XML Schemas:
> - Schematron
> - TREX
> - RELAX
From my (very limited) experience with TREX it does not support this kind of
constraint (unless there is a TREX implementation of datatypes other XML
Schema Datatypes). Which is not to say that it should not be considered for
future Best Practices-- it does offer several features that are not
available in W3C XML Schemas (such as interleave, ambiguous content models,
the not element and many more)-- and it is easy to learn.
> (3) The third option is to write a stylesheet to check the constraints.
> [Note: I got this idea from an article written by Rick Jelliffe.]
I think this is a great idea, but I don't see how it differs from option 1
fundamentally. XSLT in this case is Yet Another Validation Language. It
has to be learned as well. Now, if you wanted to recommend a specific
validation language for this purpose (though I think that may be a bad idea)
then I think XSLT is a definite option-- of course Schematron is probably
better formalized for validation. Should options 1 and 3 be combined? or
more fully separated (for each possible schema language)?