[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XMLSchema
- From: "David E. Cleary" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: XML Developers' List <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 12:57:55 -0500
> I'd suggest taking a closer look at _how_ those specs have adopted XML
> Schema Datatypes. RELAX, for example, supports only built-in data types,
> and identifies them _without_ the use of namespace prefixes - "string"
> instead of "xsd:string".
The datatypes are identified in the PSVI by a URI. It doesn't matter what
QName an implementation uses as long as they have the same semantics as a
Schema datatype and the proper URI is generated for the PSVI.