[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
- From: "David E. Cleary" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: XML DEV <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 08:41:38 -0500
> Other interpretations are doubtless possible, and even make sense in
> particular contexts. There's no guarantee that the string 45.67 in
> fact represents a real number.
And this is supossedly a good thing? That a producer of the data and the
consumer of the data can disagree about what the data means? I'll take data
typing any day over anarchy.