[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: XML DEV <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:38:17 -0500
David E. Cleary said -
> > Other interpretations are doubtless possible, and even make sense in
> > particular contexts. There's no guarantee that the string 45.67 in
> > fact represents a real number.
> And this is supossedly a good thing? That a producer of the data and the
> consumer of the data can disagree about what the data means? I'll take data
> typing any day over anarchy.
Tell you what, I'm glad my email client didn't interpret the string '45.67'
as a floating point number!