[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Relative Namespaces
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 08:43:03 -0500
Jeff Rafter asked -
> Also to clarify-- is Tim saying that the following is pointless because it
> equates to a prefixed name being treated as a non namespace name or is he
> saying that the document is in error wrt to namespaces because the prefix
> can not logically be resolved?
> <foo:bar xmlns:foo="http://foo.com">
> <foo:baz xmlns:foo=""/>
I think that this is a way to have the foo:baz element have no namespace
rather than that of its parent. How else could you indicate that, if an empty
string were different from no namespace?