[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XML Encoding of XPath: Examples
- From: Rick Jelliffe <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 20:20:50 +0800
From: Eric van der Vlist <email@example.com>
> I agree that the correspondence is probably one way (a pattern may be
> written as a rule but a rule cannot always be written as a pattern).
My point is slightly different. Two very different schema languages may have
schemas that accept the same files without complaint: but that is only one
aspect of a schema language and it may not even be the most important one.
A schema language builds some kind of data model concerning the data: in the
case of XML Schemas this data model is that there are complex and simple
types and that types get derived from types and information items may belong
to a type.
In Schematron the data model is that there are patterns which are objects
that exist independently of particular elements, and that patterns may
connect to parts of a document as a series of subject elements with
particular roles. A pattern does not adhere to its context node in a
particular way: the context node is just the most convenient node to pivot
the pattern around.