[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XML Schema: Formal Description is now published
- From: Jonathan Borden <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, email@example.com
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:59:41 -0500
Jonathan Robie wrote:
> ... The goals of the formalization
> are to:
> Specify names for all components of an XML Schema, so that they can
> be uniquely identified by URIs. Such unique identifiers may be useful to
> XML Query, RDF, and topic maps, among others.
Of course the syntax of a URI fragment identifier (which MSL defines) is
dependent on the media type of the referenced entity. XML Schema suggests
"text/xml" or "application/xml". RFC 3023 indicates that XPointer (once
recommended) is expected to be the fragment id syntax for these media types.
Ought XML Schema define its own media type (now that MSL has a W3C home)?