[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XML Blueberry
- From: James Robertson <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:28:15 +1000
At 06:55 22/06/2001, John Cowan wrote:
>>But this new and incompatible version should be christened XML 1.01, or
>>any other version number that reflects the evolution of XML.
>><?xml version='1.01'?> isn't that bad, and it implies exactly what you say.
>The Core WG has not yet decided whether changing the version number or
>inventing some new kind of label is the Right Thing.
>Comments are solicited.
I'm with others on this one:
If it is decided that a change needs to
be made, then surely the version number
will be updated ... otherwise, why call
it a "version number" at all?
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution