[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: WD-xmlschema-formal-20010320: "XML Schema: Formal Description "
- From: "Fuchs, Matthew" <matthew.fuchs@commerceone.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:15:28 -0700
This bounced on round one.
Matthew
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fuchs, Matthew
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 11:23 AM
> To: 'james.anderson@setf.de'; www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org;
> xml-dev@lists.xml.org; www-xml-query-comments@w3.org
> Subject: RE: WD-xmlschema-formal-20010320: "XML Schema: Formal
> Description "
>
>
> The XML Schema formalization is an ongoing effort of the
> Schema Working
> Group. The March 20th document is the latest publicly
> available version.
> Work continues, and so further working drafts will undoubtedly be made
> public.
>
> The formal description is an effort that started after XML
> Schema was fairly
> well developed -- XML Schema doesn't depend on the formal
> description in any
> way. On the contrary, the formal description is an attempt
> to retroactively
> explicate Schema with a formal model.
>
> Matthew
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: james anderson [mailto:james.anderson@setf.de]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 4:04 AM
> > To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org; xml-dev@lists.xml.org;
> > www-xml-query-comments@w3.org
> > Subject: WD-xmlschema-formal-20010320: "XML Schema: Formal
> > Description"
> >
> >
> >
> > WD-query-datamodel-20010607 references this document.
> > REC-xmlschema-1-20010502 does not appear to.
> >
> > Has the earlier formal description been superceded? By
> > REC-xmlschema-1 itself?
> >
> > ...
> >
>