[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT] The stigma of schema
- From: John Cowan <email@example.com>
- To: Uche Ogbuji <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:04:10 -0400
Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> Since the last I checked, the XML community is not the respectable arbiter
> of word usage,
There is none.
> I shall personally continue to use "schemata" as the plural
> of "schema", and continue to argue that others should do so.
By all means. That is the Way of the English language, where
orthography (or in this case, morphology) evolves by a Hartree-Fock
iterative process (consult your local physicist).
There is / one art || John Cowan <email@example.com>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein