[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT] The stigma of schema
- From: Rod Davison <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: John Cowan <email@example.com>,Uche Ogbuji <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:38:29 -0400
The processification of wording, while having intererstingness, outscopes the
goalhood of xml-deving.
On Thursday 28 June 2001 03:04 pm, John Cowan wrote:
> Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> > Since the last I checked, the XML community is not the respectable
> > arbiter of word usage,
> There is none.
> > I shall personally continue to use "schemata" as the plural
> > of "schema", and continue to argue that others should do so.
> By all means. That is the Way of the English language, where
> orthography (or in this case, morphology) evolves by a Hartree-Fock
> iterative process (consult your local physicist).