[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Well-formed Blueberry
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 13:59:07 -0400
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> An XSLT processor is a tree-to-tree transformation. The XML
> declaration is not part of the tree. It is produced only as part of
> the final, optional serialization of the document. Assuming the
> Blueberry declaration is part of the XML declaration, it would not
> be chosen until the entire output tree was available for inspection
> so that the presence or absence of Bluebbery characters could be
> definitively ascertained.
What's more (unless I am forgetting something), no name can be
generated in the output unless it appeared as a name in the input,
either the stylesheet or the source. Blueberryness, therefore,
is contagious.
--
There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein