[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Closing Blueberry
- From: Richard Tobin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 00:51:46 +0100 (BST)
>Read it more closely. The *characters* (i.e. non-markup) returned
>to the application are *as if* all CRs and CRLFs had been changed
>to LFs before parsing.
>That means a parser can keep the original representation right up to
>the moment it is creating a DOM Text node or invoking the
>SAX characters callback, at which point CRs that do not come from
>character references must be removed or changed to LFs. Since CR is
>allowed in the S production, any CR characters in markup need not
>be removed or changed.
Are you suggesting that if NEL were added to the translated line-end
characters, but not to the S production, this would not be sufficient
(where NEL represents the character) legal?