[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
- From: Ann Navarro <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: John Cowan <email@example.com>, Rick Jelliffe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 00:02:11 -0400
At 10:59 PM 7/22/2001 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
>We are not talking about not labelling. The issue is: should a document
>labelled Blueberry be required to actually exploit at least one Blueberry
>feature, or is it all right to take a well-formed XML 1.0 document
>and label it Blueberry without further change?
Why wouldn't it be ok?
Any intersection between the sets of well-formed XML 1.0 documents and XML
"Blueberry" documents can be labelled as one or the other, or both (just as
a valid document can also be labelled well-formed -- that particular
intersection is not mutually exclusive).