RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML Schema ?

["Fuchs, Matthew" <matthew.fuchs@commerceone.com>]

Exactly.

Matthew

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI [mailto:kohsukekawaguchi@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 12:08 PM
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: [xml-dev] Re: XML Schema ?
> 
> 
> 
> > Notice that the restriction has no content. If this is 
> valid, then is the
> > intent to just extend the "base64Binary" builtin type? Or 
> assign a different
> > name to the "base64Binary" builtin type? I thought <restriction> was
> > intended to restrict a new datatype to a *subset* of an 
> existing type?
> 
> I suppose CryptoBinary can still be considered as a 
> restriction of base64Binary.
> In other words, it's not an alias, although it behaves like 
> that to some
> extent.
> 
> I don't see anything in the spec that contradicts my interpretation.
> 
> 
> In mathematics, if A=B, then one can usually say that A is a 
> subset of B.
> To exclude that possibility, one has to say that A is a 
> proper subset of
> B.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> regards,
> ----------------------
> K.Kawaguchi
> E-Mail: kohsukekawaguchi@yahoo.com
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>