[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 14:38:02 -0400
On Mon, 2001-10-01 at 14:22, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> For the scope of authority over that set of
> contract entities to which the answer can be
> applied.
Uh, Len... I may be misreading it, but I don't see a "who" there.
"Contract entities" is not especially compelling to those of us who
currently find contracts in this field to be more bondage than blessing.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@simonstl.com]
>
> On Mon, 2001-10-01 at 13:54, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> > o What is needed?
> > o What is possible?
> > o What is sustainable?
>
> I'd add a "for who" to the end of all of those questions.
>
--
Simon St.Laurent
"Every day, in every way, I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue