[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day)
- From: PaulT <email@example.com>
- To: Ann Navarro <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Don Park <email@example.com>,firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 14:25:01 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ann Navarro" <email@example.com>
> At 12:09 PM 10/5/2001 -0700, Don Park wrote:
> >Assuming I have your vote for Lord High Dictator of the W3C position <g>,
> >propose that W3C adopt a patent policy that basically states "W3C and all
> >its members will:
> >1) do their best to ensure against patent fringement in our specs
> >2) disclose patents affecting any W3C activities or forfeit profit from
> >3) will challenge legally any patent disputes that may arise after
> >4) will deprecate recommendations if patent challenge fails
> >I think such a policy will provide reasonable level of protection against
> >patents in standards.
> Unfortunately, that's really what they have now, and it clearly hasn't
If it *clearly* hasn't worked, may I ask for some example?
What are *partuclar* problems that W3C has, bulding
the web on open source stuff, playing by these principles?