xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names

Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names

Please change the name of this thread because I don't want REST to get
the blame for namespaces' confusing usage of URIs. ;)
 
 Paul Prescod

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names
  - From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names
  - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@attbi.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names
  - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@attbi.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names
  - From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names
  - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@attbi.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names
  - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names
  - From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>