[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Good points, Jonathan.
Jonathan Robie wrote:
> 1. Let's figure out which implementations do a particularly good job of
> implementing XML Schema. If there are one or two that are really good, that
> would be very useful information, even if there are a bunch that are not
> good. Let's make compatibility a marketable commodity.
According to my experience which is absolutely not exhaustive since I
have been using mainly only tools running on my laptop (Linux) and
tested on the examples which are included in my book (to come) about W3C
XML Schema, the most complete and conform implementation is by far Xerces-J.
I have also found their developers very active in fixing bugs as soon as
you report one.
Again, it's not exhaustive, but kudus for Xerces-J!
Eric
--
See you in Paris.
http://www.afnet.fr/afnet/net200x/programme.html#T9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
