[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Eee,
Xerces-J is not too bad, but I have spent many hours
with the following example, trying to figure out, what's wrong:
<AAA xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:jj="http://www.zvon.org/jiratj/"
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="correct_0.xsd"><jj:a/></AAA>
schema (correct_0.xsd):
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:jj="http://www.zvon.org/jiratj/"
xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<xsd:element name="AAA">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:complexContent>
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:anyType"/>
</xsd:complexContent>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:schema>
The schema should specify an element, which is empty, am I right?
See:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/#emptyContent
and your article somewhere on XML.com :-)
But both xsv and Xerces-J haven't say even "boooo!" and where happy :-(
(I am using Xerces 2.0.0, the xsv is some month old)
Or am I overlooking something?
Regards
Jirka
Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> Good points, Jonathan.
>
> Jonathan Robie wrote:
>
>> 1. Let's figure out which implementations do a particularly good job
>> of implementing XML Schema. If there are one or two that are really
>> good, that would be very useful information, even if there are a bunch
>> that are not good. Let's make compatibility a marketable commodity.
>
>
> According to my experience which is absolutely not exhaustive since I
> have been using mainly only tools running on my laptop (Linux) and
> tested on the examples which are included in my book (to come) about W3C
> XML Schema, the most complete and conform implementation is by far
> Xerces-J.
>
> I have also found their developers very active in fixing bugs as soon as
> you report one.
>
> Again, it's not exhaustive, but kudus for Xerces-J!
>
> Eric
--
<name firstName="Jirka" surname="Jirat"/>
<mail> jiratj@systinet.com </mail>
<support> http://www.zvon.org </support>
<zvonMailingList> http://www.zvon.org/index.php?nav_id=4
</zvonMailingList>
|