[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
As far as I have understood, it is the design of XML Schema,
what should be better for this - because the Schema does not leave any
ambiguities for de-/serialization
(this is the reason for the error message "non-deterministic content
model for type ...", I think)
And I believe the Schemas are designed well in this sense.
Jirka
Fredrik Lindgren wrote:
> Did they say that the W3C XML Schema specification was better for this,
> or was it just that the tool support for it is better when it comes to
> SOAP. Maybe we just need to implement some RELAX NG driven code
> generators and SOAP tools.
>
> What do the experts on the list say? Is there anything in the specs that
> should make people choose W3C XML Schema over RELAX NG for SOAP? Does
> the superiority of RELAX NG for documents mean that it is inferior for
> data?
>
> /Fredrik Lindgren
>
> Jiri Jirat wrote:
>
>> I would like to join the discussion again.
>>
>>
>> I have talked to developers and what I have heard was
>> that their is at least one thing, where XML Schemas/ta are
>> better than Relax NG - when you do deserialization/serialization
>> of objects into SOAP messages.
>>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
--
<name firstName="Jirka" surname="Jirat"/>
<mail> jiratj@systinet.com </mail>
<support> http://www.zvon.org </support>
<zvonMailingList> http://www.zvon.org/index.php?nav_id=4
</zvonMailingList>
|
