RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

Don't overlook RELAX RNG.  Despite it's status 
vis a vis the W3C, I think it has a future as 
the "easier to do and easier to explain" schema 
language with a little less than XSD and a 
bit more than DTDs.

len

From: tariq abdur-rahim [mailto:ecliptoid330@yahoo.com]

Thanks a lot betty, len, and michael.  The input and
advice is very informative and most definately
appreciated.  i guess in a nutshell, DTDs still carry
a certain significance and an amount of usefulness,
but the Schema+Schematron combination is a 'stronger'
approach to take in XML application development.

len, i will definately check out the resources that
you suggested.