OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   RE: [xml-dev] Can RDDL and RDF coexist?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

Are they in the semiotic sense, arbitrary signs (chosen 
by convention, and not inherently meaningful)?  

The problem of namespace dereferencing is to make a sign inherently 
meaningful.  Otherwise, they are simply systemic and 
can be replaced by any other sign system that provides an 
isomorphic functionality (ie, are keys or indexes).


From: Hutchison, Nigel [mailto:Nigel.Hutchison@softwareag.com]

 Further, the RDF Syntax spec requires that the
properties namespace must not only be a label, but, in fact, must be a
valid URL to an RDF Schema document (which defines what the property
means, thus enabling dynamic understanding of a property).  That's my
understanding.  Is it an incorrect understanding? 

Yes it is incorrect.

One of the odd things about RDF is though it is full of URIs, RDF processing
doesn't involve  URI dereferencing. URIs are used like keys.


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS