[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 03:12 PM 6/7/2002 +0100, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>RELAX NG is constitutionally incapable of providing reliable
>type assertions.
Constitutionally incapable?
While I understand that RELAX NG _can_ support non-deterministic/unreliable
models, I don't believe that makes it incapable of supporting reliable type
assertions provided that the writers of the schema consider that a goal.
I've argued for a long while that type information should be 'painted' as a
separate process from validation. Compared to that approach, I can't say I
find W3C XML Schema particularly reliable as a source of type assertions.
Simon St.Laurent
"Every day in every way I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue
|