OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   RE: [xml-dev] XSLT and XML Schema (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resist

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • To: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
  • Subject: RE: [xml-dev] XSLT and XML Schema (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box)
  • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
  • Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 07:47:22 -0700
  • Thread-index: AcIOKToub7Npi4HjSVOndzWVdGo5qgAABWNQAAIxKGY=
  • Thread-topic: XSLT and XML Schema (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box)

Please read last months archives[0]. There were probably over a 100 mailings about this and that horse has been effectively beaten. 
 
[0] http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200205/threads.html

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Manos Batsis [mailto:m.batsis@bsnet.gr] 
	Sent: Fri 6/7/2002 6:48 AM 
	To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org 
	Cc: 
	Subject: [xml-dev] XSLT and XML Schema (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box)
	
	



	I was wondering how this list feels about the current draft of XSLT2.0
	and it's use of XML Schemas. IMHO, the choice of outsourcing this "type
	importing" functionality in a way to be transparent to XSLT, could
	result in the ability to use types from various schema languages but
	XSLT 2.0 from what I understand does take XML Schema for granted. Anyone
	want to make it clearer for me?
	Regards,
	
	Manos
	
	
	> -----Original Message-----
	> From: Mike Champion [mailto:mc@xegesis.org]
	> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 4:40 PM
	> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
	> Subject: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
	>
	>
	>
	>
	>
	> "The reality is, XML Schema is the foundation for the rest of
	> XML," said Box. Technologies such as XML Query take XML
	> Schema "for granted, as a given," he said.
	>
	> SOAP messages need to function with XML Schema, he said. "XML
	> Schema is an inevitability. Resistance is futile. There
	> is no point in not embracing this thing and I strongly
	> encourage those of you who work in Web services technologies
	> [to] make sure your story is straight" with respect to XML
	> Schema, Box said.
	>
	http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/02/06/06/020606hnbox.xml?s=rss&;
	t=news&slot=3
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	-----------------------------------------------------------------
	The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
	initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
	
	The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
	
	To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
	manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
	
	
	-----------------------------------------------------------------
	The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
	initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
	
	The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
	
	To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
	manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
	
	





 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS