[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
The fact that a number of W3C Working Groups make a political decision to create interdependencies amongst W3C recommendations (some of them even circular) does not say anything about the technical merits of W3C XML Schema. It is indeed an indictment of the W3C process and their idea of "layered specs"
-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Skonnard [mailto:aarons@develop.com]
Sent: Mon 6/10/2002 7:30 AM
To: 'Rick Jelliffe'; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Cc:
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
> To the extent that that is the case, to say "XSD is here to stay" is
> a statement of branding and power rather than anything concerning
> technical merits or compatability.
The fact that the W3C has assumed XML Schema in layered specs like XPath
2.0, XSLT 2.0, and XML Query (the original argument) says a lot about
the technical merits considering the W3C process.
-aaron
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
