[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Wow! What politics would be of interest to the WG entity consisting of
representatives from numerous competing organizations?
If you're implying that individual organizations are playing politics,
then of course I buy that but I find it hard to believe that
representatives from individual organizations would have the skill to
manipulate so many others.
-aaron
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:dareo@microsoft.com]
>
> The fact that a number of W3C Working Groups make a political decision
to
> create interdependencies amongst W3C recommendations (some of them
even
> circular) does not say anything about the technical merits of W3C XML
> Schema. It is indeed an indictment of the W3C process and their idea
of
> "layered specs"
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Skonnard [mailto:aarons@develop.com]
>
> > To the extent that that is the case, to say "XSD is here to
stay"
> > a statement of branding and power rather than anything
concerning
> > technical merits or compatability.
>
> The fact that the W3C has assumed XML Schema in layered specs
like
> XPath
> 2.0, XSLT 2.0, and XML Query (the original argument) says a lot
about
> the technical merits considering the W3C process.
>
> -aaron
|
