[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
From a cursory glance at the schema document at
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema.xsd I see at least one;
<xs:restriction base="xs:anySimpleType">
<xs:whiteSpace value="preserve" id="string.preserve" />
</xs:restriction>
So can regular schemas do the above or is this a special case that only
applies to the sForS? I used to have a list of issues, if I find it I'll
review the errata and if anything is left unresolved I'll pass that
along to our W3C XML Schema working group members.
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
The shortest distance between two points is under repair.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk]
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:41 PM
> To: Dare Obasanjo
> Cc: peej@mindspring.com; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in
> an instance doc
>
>
> "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com> writes:
>
> > The schema For Schema contains a number of issues. Any parser that
> > validates it is broken.
>
> All fixed as of last week, as far as I and the XML Schema WG
> know. See the published errata for details [1]. Any that
> remain, please let us know!
>
> ht
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata.html
> --
> Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group,
> University of Edinburgh
> W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
> 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44)
> 131 650-4440
> Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
> URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
> [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without
> it is forged spam]
>
|