[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Amelia A Lewis scripsit:
> So, is it better to define a type in XML as something that can be
> validated, or as something that maps to type A in language Z, type B in
> language Y, type A again in language X, and type L in language O?
How did this get to be about the *definition* of types? I thought it
was about the *utility* of types, or more precisely type assignment.
--
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
|
