xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and

Re: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:59:00 +1000
References: <4F4182C71C1FDD4BA0937A7EB7B8B4C10576C6F2@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>

> "If everyone develops their own data, schemas and definitions, we have a
> Tower of Babel and we haven't gotten what we wanted."

> That pretty much sums it up.

So if a computer makes up a schema automatically to fit some data (e.g. .NET)
that is good, but if a person does it, it is bad?

Puzzled
Rick

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
  - From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread