xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9

Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: aray@nyct.net (Arjun Ray)
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 01:04:35 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <heriguoqf4tp1g82gnj4ec6gkpambflmql@4ax.com> from "Arjun Ray" at Jun 14, 2002 04:23:58 AM

Arjun Ray scripsit:

> Actually, it isn't.  There is no requirement (AFAIK) that the ArchUse PI
> appear within the subsets of a document type declaration - it can be a
> free standing PI in the document instance (ie another part of the =
> prolog.)

Sorry, I meant that it's inside the *instance*.  Never mind.


-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
  - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread