[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> wrote:
| Rick Jelliffe scripsit:
|> Why not just assign whole element sets to a namespace, in the external
|> DSDL framework, and leave the syntax of DTDs exactly as it is?
|
| I don't understand this. How do you specify that the content model of
| a foo:one element is a foo:two element followed by an html:p element?
Why is this a requirement?
The content model of a foo:one element could specify a foo:two element
followed by a foo:three element. Identifying a foo:three element as the
"same" as an html:p element - either in a specific occurrence or for all
occurrences of foo:three elements in various content models - is a
straightforward matter of annotation. Using an attribute for this has
precedent, too.
|> What are the requirements for DTDs in DSDL?
|
| The title of Part 9 is all we have to go on, and it talks about
| namespace-aware and datatype-aware DTDs.
Insanity.
|