[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
>I was rather referring to the inability to give the same name to distinct
>things:... Backed by a stronger
>validation formalism, though, they can have the same GI.
Wonderful, now parsers will not be confused, only people.
.
I have never fought too hard against the "explicit-name for
explicit-model" restriction, because I have watched too many
newbies (technical newbies, they knew their content) finally
realize, because of an XML restriction, that they had, sometimes
for years, conflated several different nouns/meanings and caused
themselves confusion.
>The practice of the XML community has been overwhelmingly to grant the
>GI fundamental importance: fulminating against this sociological fact
>will not make it go away.
And the harm in requiring more precision in an XML document than
I need in casual conversation is what exactly?
--Debbie
--
======================================================================
Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre mailto:dalapeyre@mulberrytech.com
Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9633
Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================
|
