xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9

Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: dalapeyre@mulberrytech.com (Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre)
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 16:01:57 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <a05100314b92ff54692b5@[192.168.254.9]> from "Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre" at Jun 14, 2002 03:39:07 PM

Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre scripsit:

> And the harm in requiring more precision in an XML document than
> I need in casual conversation is what exactly?

The flexibility of being able to overload names that are conceptually
similar or equivalent but distinct at the implementation level.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
  - From: Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre <dalapeyre@mulberrytech.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] MSXML + Xerces DOM compatibility
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread