[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
I agree with Rick Jelliffe; most people when mentioning the Infoset have
a well formed, valid XML document (thus serializable) in mind.
Regards,
Manos
> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr]
> Why the restriction? Isn't [1] clear enough?
>
> Jean-Jacques.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/#intro
>
> Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>
> >As an extra twist on this, may I recommend that any rfc
> make it clear that
> >when talking about XML infosets, we only mean "XML Infosets
> that can be
> >serialized into XML documents."
> >
> >This is because "XML infoset" unfortunately seem to have a
> life of its
> >own, often being something more like the "DOM infoset". This gives
> >the potential for a mismatch.
> >
> >Cheers
> >Rick Jelliffe
> >
> >
>
>
|
