[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Dare Obasanjo scripsit:
> Type derivation in XSD comes in two flavors; extension and restriction.
> Extension is easy to mimic even with DTDs. However how does RELAX NG
> mimic restrictions (especially the nested ones) that involve facets like
> xs:minInclusive, xs:maxInclusive?
RNG can specify constraints on simple types, but not nested constraints.
How does one restrict complex types in WXS?
> Without the constraint that they have compatible content models then it
> is just an xs:choice
Agreed.
> Interesting. Could you point me at the part of the spec or tutorial that
> discusses this functionality.
In the spec:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/relax-ng/spec-20011203.html#IDAG3YR
Section 4.7, 3rd paragraph.
In the tutorial:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/relax-ng/tutorial-20011203.html#IDA3PZR
Section 13
Note that there are no constraints on the redefinition: the new rule need
have no relation to the old.
--
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
|
