[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "Don Box" <dbox@microsoft.com>,"John Cowan" <jcowan@reutershealth.com>,"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: "Don Box" <dbox@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 20:54:30 -0700
- Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Thread-index: AcIChy3mDf5O05b1T06I+QKmPT9WVAYpk4tgAAFMFSA=
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Box
> Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 8:37 PM
> To: John Cowan; Bullard, Claude L (Len)
> Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
>
> Wow! I was knocked out by this one. What good are datatypes if one can
> work in terms of the value space of the type rather than the lexical
> form?
In case it wasn't obvious, that sentence should have read "What good are
datatypes if one CANNOT work in terms of the value space..."
DB
|
