xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easiertoautho

Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easiertoautho

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easiertoauthor) XML
From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 00:19:47 -0400
References: <016901c21af5$f5275320$0200a8c0@elcel.ldn><3D163BB5.31362495@prescod.net> <01a201c21b00$de9127c0$0200a8c0@elcel.ldn><3D16463F.4010407@textuality.com><4.2.0.58.20020623183243.01967258@pop3.east.ora.com>

[Simon St.Laurent]

. In the meantime, the
> grumpy survivor of Dynamic HTML and the editor in me both scream that
short
> end tags would be a horrible mistake that will in fact add complexity in
> ways that go infinitely beyond a question-mark in the grammar.
>
 Plus, xhtml with short tags wouldn't work in standard browsers.


Cheers,

Tom P

References:
- Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
  - From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@elcel.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
  - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
  - From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@elcel.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
  - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier toauthor) XML
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Logical markup Language
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread