[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 13:30, Jonathan Borden wrote:
> Recognizing and processing natural language is something that's been done
> for a couple of decades -- albeit imperfectly -- and as I am sure you are
> aware, the grammar(s) are complicted -- what is generally needed is some
> notion of the intended semantics of the sentences. In any case, this example
> isn't a good use case for XML schema languages and 'validity'.
No, but it is a good use case for extensibility in XML schema languages.
If you are happy with the result of the unix "file" command to determine
the type of a text and see if it's more likely a Java source code, a
snippet of Python or an English text, you may want to validate the
document using its result instead of the code.
I am actually considering implementing pyxie based transformations into
xvif to allow this kind of features:
http://bugzilla.xmlschemata.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14
Eric
--
See you in San Diego.
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2002/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
