[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> Or you could have postponed this errata to W3C XML Schema 1.1 which
> hopefully would involve a namespace change.
It may or may not have a change but why do you _hope_ for that.
That's saying that if XML schema has any kind of revision, then the name
of every schema construct should change.
Do you also hope that if there is an XML 1.1 that
<!ELEMENT and <!ATTLIST no longer work and XML 1.1 has different names
for these constructs?
I see no difference between changing the namespace for W3C schema and
saying that in XML 1.1 the syntax is now
<!ELEMENT.1.1 or something.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
|
