[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
From: "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>
> > Or you could have postponed this errata to W3C XML Schema 1.1 which
> > hopefully would involve a namespace change.
>
> It may or may not have a change but why do you _hope_ for that.
> That's saying that if XML schema has any kind of revision, then the name
> of every schema construct should change.
>
> Do you also hope that if there is an XML 1.1 that
>
> <!ELEMENT and <!ATTLIST no longer work and XML 1.1 has different names
> for these constructs?
>
> I see no difference between changing the namespace for W3C schema and
> saying that in XML 1.1 the syntax is now
> <!ELEMENT.1.1 or something.
But since it seems that most (all?) major XML processors will not accept
documents labelled as XML 1.1, isn't the effect pretty similar to renaming
<!ELEMENT.
Cheers
Rick
|
