xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Underwhelmed (WAS: [xml-dev] XOM micro tutorial)

Re: [xml-dev] Underwhelmed (WAS: [xml-dev] XOM micro tutorial)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Underwhelmed (WAS: [xml-dev] XOM micro tutorial)
From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 21:20:06 +0000
In-reply-to: <200209202115.g8KLF6330284@dragon.flightlab.com>
References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B986@HQ5> <200209202115.g8KLF6330284@dragon.flightlab.com>

Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com> wrote:

| There were and are plenty of language-specific APIs for SGML/XML 
| processing, and none of them need to interoperate with each other. 
| This isn't something that the W3C needs to standardize IMO.

I agree.  The formlization of an infoset spec is not only enough, it makes
DOM irrelevant.

Grove plans, anyone?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Underwhelmed (WAS: [xml-dev] XOM micro tutorial)
  - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] Underwhelmed (WAS: [xml-dev] XOM micro tutorial)
  - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Underwhelmed (WAS: [xml-dev] XOM micro tutorial)
  - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Underwhelmed (WAS: [xml-dev] XOM micro tutorial)
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Underwhelmed (WAS: [xml-dev] XOM micro tutorial)
  - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] OT: Hundred Flowers (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] Underwhelmed (WAS: [xml-dev]
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Underwhelmed (WAS: [xml-dev] XOM micro tutorial)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Underwhelmed (WAS: [xml-dev] XOM micro tutorial)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Underwhelmed (WAS: [xml-dev] XOM micro tutorial)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS