Lists Home |
Date Index |
- To: "David Sheldon" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Re: Multiple xsd:imports on the same namespace
- From: "Mark Seaborne" <MSeaborne@origoservices.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:56:42 +0100
- Cc: <email@example.com>
- Thread-index: AcJ0ScIPwml6unP3StiIcz+MAWtNSAAABx6Q
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Re: Multiple xsd:imports on the same namespace
From: David Sheldon [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: 15 October 2002 13:51
To: Jeni Tennison
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Multiple xsd:imports on the same namespace
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:13:31PM +0100, Jeni Tennison wrote:
>> Hi David,
> >> However we have been asked to work with these schemas by a customer
> >> who had them produced elsewhere. We would prefer to use the schemas
> >> that we have been given unmodified.
>> Well, you might be able to find an XML Schema validator that merges
>> multiple imports of the same namespace -- it's legal for validators to
>> do that. Presumably if your customers designed and are using these
>> schemas, they're also using such a validator. Perhaps you should ask
>> them what they're using, and then use that.
>> (If you could also let us know which validator that is, I'd certainly
>> be interested in knowing.)
>I think the schemas were designed in XMLSpy, and they do indeed validate
>correctly in that for me. Also, IBM's SQC does not object to the
>schemas, which makes sense as they are valid. Unfortunately XMLSpy is
>not suitable for our purposes.
I would be a little wary of believing everything that XMLSpy tells you. We use XMLSpy here for authoring, but never for testing validity.
All the best