Lists Home |
Date Index |
From: "Tim Bray" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> I am maintaining the position
> that constraining syntax is pretty well orthogonal to naming characters
> and it is only due to the accident of DTD history that we have this idea
> that it's inevitable that "schemas" do both.
But, for example, MathML defines both elements and entities.
Would you regard it as a special case, pioneering?