[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Mike Champion wrote:
> Y'all want to stuff him back in the bottle, fine ... but it's not me that you
> have to convince.
Me neither, but it's too late. Pandora's box lays in shards on the floor.
> My strong preference would be for the "one standard human-readable syntax"
> position if I had my druthers. I totally agree (e.g. with an article by Sean
> McGrath) that in the vast majority of XML *applications* the parsing overhead
> / bloat issue is a red herring.
And indeed it is. The problem is that the vast majority of a hugely vast field
still leaves a vast minority. Vast enough to cause interop trouble.
--
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Research Engineer, Expway
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
|
