[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
AndrewWatt2000@aol.com writes:
> What I guess you are saying is that Richard Stallman could (or has) put
> forward a counter argument to the point I made and that you find his counter
> argument compelling.
>
> Richard Stallman may be less than entirely objective about matters like this.
That's an interesting way to refute an argument. I suppose you *are*
entirely objective?
Ari.
|