[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 10:17 PM +0100 5/7/03, Michael Kay wrote:
>There are plenty of areas in these specs that would really benefit from
>detailed review and feedback, but saying "I think I could design a
>better language" is not helpful at this stage.
Unless of course you do design a better language. I think RELAX NG
and JDOM are proofs by example that when a W3C spec goes off the
rails others can and will create better replacements. I suspect this
will happen with XSLT 2 as well as the implementers of XSLT 1 who've
given up in disgust on XSLT 2 and XPath 2 begin to look for something
interesting to do.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo@metalab.unc.edu
Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002)
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA
|
