xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Xpath Question

Re: [xml-dev] Xpath Question

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Xpath Question
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:57:32 -0700
Cc: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>,xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <EB0A327048144442AFB15FCE18DC96C7272CCE@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <EB0A327048144442AFB15FCE18DC96C7272CCE@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Michael Rys wrote:

> Sorry but this is FUD.
> 
> XPath 1.0 has no conformance requirement on what data model a parser
> needs to generate.

So, MSXML is existence proof that it's possible to be both conformant 
and wrong.  But we already knew that.  -Tim

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Xpath Question
  - From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@microsoft.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Xpath Question
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Xpath Question
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Xpath Question
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Xpath Question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread